Legal Opinion
Sheridan v. Board of Education
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided November 14, 1989No. 7616PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtDaly, J.
The plaintiff appeals from the granting of the defendant’s motion for summary judgment. The plaintiff claims that the court erred (1) in denying the plaintiff’s motion to strike or stay the motion for summary judgment, and (2) in finding that no genuine issues of fact existed to preclude the granting of the motion for summary judgment. We find no error.
The following facts are relevant to the disposition of this appeal. In July, 1985, the defendant New Fairfield board of education1 sent a letter to the plaintiff, Marilyn Sheridan, offering her a position as an English teacher at New Fairfield…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United Oil Co. v. Urban Redevelopment CommissionSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
- Burns v. Hartford HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1984
- Nolan v. BorkowskiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
- Whitaker v. ColemanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1940
- Standard Tallow Corp. v. JowdySupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- 2830 Whitney Avenue Corp. v. Heritage Canal Development Associates, Inc.Connecticut Appellate Court · 1994
- Associates Financial Services of America, Inc. v. SorensenConnecticut Appellate Court · 1997
- Na-Mor, Inc. v. RoballeyConnecticut Appellate Court · 1991
- Cawley v. SchochatConnecticut Appellate Court · 1990
- Chase Home Finance, LLC v. ScrogginConnecticut Appellate Court · 2019
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.