Legal Opinion
Associates Financial Services of America, Inc. v. Sorensen
Connecticut Appellate Court
Decided September 16, 1997No. AC 16187PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
SCHALLER, J.
In this foreclosure action, the substitute plaintiff, Ford Consumer Finance Company, Inc. (Ford Finance),1 appeals from the judgment rendered following the trial court’s granting of summary judgment in favor of the defendant Northern State Financial, LLC (Northern). Ford Finance claims that (1) General Statutes (Rev. to 1993) § 12-1572 is unconstitutional on *723its face because it fails to provide proper notice and an opportunity to be heard,3 and (2) the trial court improperly granted summary judgment. We affirm the judgment of the trial court.
The record discloses the…
2Cases cited24 opinions
- Mathews v. EldridgeSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Parratt v. TaylorSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Mennonite Board of Missions v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Suarez v. Dickmont Plastics Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1994
- Miller v. United Technologies Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by15 opinions
- Cornelius v. RosarioConnecticut Appellate Court · 2012
- Jacobson v. A1Z7, LLC (In re Jacobson)United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Connecticut · 2014
- Berger v. FitzgeraldConnecticut Appellate Court · 1999
- Associates Financial Services of America, Inc. v. SorensenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Berti v. Harlan, No. Cv 99-80826 S (Sep. 21, 2000)Connecticut Superior Court · 2000
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.