Legal Opinion

Cawley v. Schochat

Connecticut Appellate Court

Decided March 27, 1990No. 8100PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtSpallone, J.

The defendant appeals from the money judgment rendered by the trial court for the plaintiff and from the dismissal of his counterclaims. The defendant claims that the trial court erred (1) in granting the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment on the issue of liability despite unresolved issues of law and fact, (2) in dismissing his counterclaims, and (3) in granting a money judgment where the plaintiff sought foreclosure of a mortgage. We find no error.

The following facts are undisputed. The defendant contracted to purchase from the plaintiff a multi-unit house at 383-385 Poplar Street, New…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Schaffer v. SchafferSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1982
  2. In re PresnickConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  3. Williamson v. Commissioner of TransportationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. State v. LucaConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989
  5. Sheridan v. Board of EducationConnecticut Appellate Court · 1989

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Coble v. Maloney, No. 089843 (Jun. 18, 1992)Connecticut Superior Court · 1992
  2. Jacovino v. Connecticut Amusement, No. 092451 (Aug. 1, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
  3. Perugini v. Wethersfield Building Supply, No. 096879 (Jul. 17, 1991)Connecticut Superior Court · 1991
  4. Shartouni v. Park Cadillac-Olds.-Pontiac, No. Cv98-033 11 52s (Dec. 2, 1999)Connecticut Superior Court · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API