People v. Williams
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
Although defendant alluded to some dissatisfaction with the court’s proposed response to a note from the deliberating jury, at no time during the trial did defendant contend that the jury was confused about the concept of acting in concert, or claim *566that the court’s supplemental instruction should have been expanded to include a separate and distinct discussion of that concept. Since defendant failed to raise a timely and specific objection to the supplemental instruction on the grounds he now raises on appeal, his current claims are unpreserved for appellate review (see People v Whalen, 59…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- People v. CrimminsNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
- People v. MalloyNew York Court of Appeals · 1982
- People v. WhalenNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
- People v. AlmodovarNew York Court of Appeals · 1984
- People v. BorrelloNew York Court of Appeals · 1981
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- People v. DixonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- People v. MartinezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2004
- People v. YoungAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Bennett v. WolfAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- People v. BenoitAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.