Legal Opinion

Zorn v. Gilbert

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 2007PublishedCited by 28 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be modified, without costs, by reinstating the legal malpractice cause of action and remitting to Supreme Court for consideration of issues raised by defendants on the motion to dismiss but not reached by that court and, as so modified, affirmed.

Defendants moved to dismiss the complaint alleging, in part, that plaintiffs legal malpractice cause of action was barred by the statute of limitations. An action to recover damages arising from legal malpractice must be commenced within three years after accrual (see CPLR 214…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. McCoy v. FeinmanNew York Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Shumsky v. EisensteinNew York Court of Appeals · 2001

3Cited by28 opinions

  1. Williamson v. PricewaterhouseCoopers LLPNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Symbol Technologies, Inc. v. Deloitte & Touche, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
  3. Farage v. EhrenbergAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014
  4. Town of Wallkill v. RosensteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  5. DeStaso v. Condon Resnick, LLPAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2011

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API