Legal Opinion
Meyer Group, Ltd. v. United States
United States Court of Federal Claims
Decided December 19, 2016No. 12-488CPublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Equal Access to Justice Act; 28 U.S.C. § 2412; Substantial Justification; Special Circumstances That Would Make EAJA Fee Award Unjust; Issue of First Impression; Breach of Real Estate Brokerage Agreement.
WILLIAMS, Judge.
OPINION AND ORDER
This matter comes before the Court on Plaintiffs application for $248,800.24 in attorney fees and expenses pursuant to the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28 U.S.C. § 2412 (2012). 1 In the underlying action, Plaintiff, The Meyer Group, Ltd. (“Meyer Group”), prevailed in this Court and on appeal in establishing that the Postal Regulatory Commission…
2Cases cited28 opinions
- Pierce v. UnderwoodSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
- Commissioner, Immigration & Naturalization Service v. JeanSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Nager Electric Company, Inc. And Keystone Engineering Corporation v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- Hong-Yee Chiu v. The United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1991
- Role Models Amer Inc v. White, ThomasCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2004
23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- 2m Research Services, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2020
- Agma Security Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- Agma Security Service, Inc. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2022
- St. Bernard Parish Government v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2019
- Stromness Mpo, LLC v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2018
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.