Legal Opinion

Dunbar v. McGill

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided April 13, 1888PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Error to Cass. (Smith, J.) Trover. Defendant brings error. The facts are stated in the opinion.

1Opinion of the CourtChamplin, J.

We granted a new trial in this case at the January term, 1887. See 64 Mich. 676 (31 N. W. Rep. 578).

The case has been again tried, and has resulted in another verdict and judgment for the plaintiff.

Error is assigned upon the charge of the court, and upon refusals to charge as requested by the defendant’s counsel. We discover no error in the charge of the court, nor in his refusal to give the defendant’s requests. So far as pertinent or proper they were covered by the charge as given.

Error is also assigned upon the rulings of the court made upon the trial. The first three errors assigned we…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Lightfoot v. PeopleMichigan Supreme Court · 1868
  2. Howard v. PatrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
  3. Dunbar v. McGillMichigan Supreme Court · 1887
  4. Labar v. CraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1885
  5. Stewart v. First National BankMichigan Supreme Court · 1880

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. WorleyWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1918
  2. Wheeler v. JenisonMichigan Supreme Court · 1899
  3. Schattler v. Daily Herald Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1910
  4. People v. ShepardMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  5. Opsomere v. OpsomereMichigan Supreme Court · 1911

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API