Legal Opinion

Labar v. Crane

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided May 6, 1885PublishedCited by 11 opinions

Error to Kalamazoo. (Mills, J.) Case. Defendant Crane brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtCooley, C. J.

This case was once before in this Court, and the decision is reported in 49 Mich. 561. On a re-trial the plaintiff recovered judgment for five hundred dollars against the defendant Crane, and the other defendants were acquitted. Crane brings error.

I. The action was brought to recover damages for malicious prosecution. At the time of the trial one Allen, who as justice had issued the warrant by which the prosecution was begun, was beyond the jurisdiction of the court, and the plaintiff offered to put in evidence his testimony given on the first trial. Eor this purpose he called the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Labar v. CraneMichigan Supreme Court · 1883

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Kaminski v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1956
  2. Schindler v. Milwaukee, Lake Shore & Western Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1891
  3. Gilson v. BronkhorstMichigan Supreme Court · 1958
  4. Toledo Traction Co. v. CameronCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1905
  5. Redding v. SnyderMichigan Supreme Court · 1958

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API