Legal Opinion

Opsomere v. Opsomere

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided December 8, 1911No. Docket No. 81PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Bay; Collins, J. Replevin by Leander Opsomere against Alex Opsomere. Judgment for plaintiff. Defendant brings error..

1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.

This case has been here before. A reference to the opinion found in 162 Mich. 65 (127 N. W. 15), will make a long statement of facts unnecessary.

Upon the second trial the plaintiff recovered a judgment. The defendant has brought the case herb by writ of error. Many of the assignments of error relate to questions which are fully covered by the opinion, and reference will not further be made to them.

Two assignments of error, however, require attention:(1) Were the notes of the stenographer admissible in evidence ?(3) Did the court err in his charge to the jury upon the question of demand ?

*6371.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Dunbar v. McGillMichigan Supreme Court · 1888
  2. Edwards v. HeuerMichigan Supreme Court · 1881
  3. Opsomere v. OpsomereMichigan Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Tiffany v. the Christman Co.Michigan Court of Appeals · 1979

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API