Wheeler v. Jenison
Michigan Supreme Court
Error to Kent; Adsit, J. Assumpsit by Morton B. Wheeler and Siegel D. Kopf against Luman Jenison and Lucius Jenison for goods sold and delivered. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants bring error.
1Opinion of the CourtMoore, J.
The defendants appeal from a judgment obtained against them by plaintiffs. The bill of particulars is as follows:
1897, July 6. Gas plant sold to defendants_____________$365 00
1897, July 6. Extra light for bar-room sold to defendants 4 10
1897, July 17. Repairing leaky sink.___________:.________ 1 45
1897, July 17. 200 pounds of carbide, at 6 cents per pound: 12 00
1897, July 17. 200 pounds of carbide, at 6 cents per pound. 12 00
1897, July 20. 200 pounds of carbide, at 6 cents per pound. 12 00
1897, July 23. Bell call system sold to defendants....... 12 00
It is the claim of plaintiffs that, prior…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Howard v. PatrickMichigan Supreme Court · 1878
- Sweet v. Michigan Central RailroadMichigan Supreme Court · 1891
- Tucker v. MowreyMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
- Brazee v. BryantMichigan Supreme Court · 1883
- Dikeman v. ArnoldMichigan Supreme Court · 1890
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Gardiner v. CourtrightMichigan Supreme Court · 1911
- Driggers v. United StatesSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1908
- People v. OsbornMichigan Supreme Court · 1919
- Pruner v. Detroit United RailwayMichigan Supreme Court · 1912
- Driggers v. United StatesCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.