Legal Opinion

Ronnigen v. Hertogs

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided June 30, 1972No. 43168PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Rogosheske, Justice.

Plaintiff appeals from an order denying his motion for a new trial of his action for damages for alleged malpractice against defendant, an attorney at law of the State of Minnesota.

Plaintiff claims he retained defendant as his attorney, who then negligently failed to prosecute a tort claim for property damage resulting from the alleged negligence of two municipal corporations. The dispositive issue is whether the trial court erred in directing a verdict for defendant. Applying the test for granting a motion for a directed verdict, Rule 50.01, Rules of Civil Procedure, we…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Christy v. SalitermanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1970
  2. Larson v. Township of New Haven, Olmsted CountySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  3. McCarty v. Budget Rent-A-CarSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
  4. White v. EschSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1899

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Togstad v. Vesely, Otto, Miller & KeefeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  2. Kurtenbach v. TeKippeSupreme Court of Iowa · 1977
  3. Admiral Merchants Motor Freight, Inc. v. O'Connor & HannanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1992
  4. Stalk v. MushkinNevada Supreme Court · 2009
  5. Warmbrodt v. BlanchardNevada Supreme Court · 1984

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API