Legal Opinion

White v. Esch

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided December 7, 1899No. Nos. 11,753—(126)PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Action in the municipal court of St. Paul to recover $250 for professional services. The case was tried before Qrr, J., and a jury, which rendered a verdict in favor of defendants; and from an order denying a motion for a new trial, plaintiff appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtStart, C. J.

Action to recover $250 from the defendants for services rendered to them by the plaintiff as a lawyer in two certain actions in the district court of the county of Ramsey. In one of the actions the Farmers’ National Bank of Owatonna was the plaintiff, and C. W. Burdick and these defendants were defendants. The action was upon an appeal bond in an action by the bank against Burdick to foreclose a mortgage executed by Burdick as principal and these defendants as sureties. The other action was by the bank against these defendants upon an undertaking given by them upon another appeal by Burdick…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. Ronnigen v. HertogsSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1972
  2. Brewer v. HartmanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1912

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API