Legal Opinion

Mitchell v. Beissenherz

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 21, 1922No. 23,618PublishedCited by 16 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTownsend, J.

The probate of a will was set aside by jury. The sole question in appellants’ brief is error in giving and refusing instructions. The praecipe calls for the original bill of exceptions containing the instructions. It is admitted that the clerk has followed the praecipe. It is also admitted that no exception is saved but by this bill. This presents the question of whether this court should recognize for any purpose the action of the clerk of the trial court in depriving himself of the custody of papers, documents ánd records of the trial court. There is no law, judicial or *588statutory,…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Marshall v. MatsonIndiana Supreme Court · 1908
  2. Brewster v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Curless v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1909
  4. Goodwine v. CraneIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  5. Burson v. National Park BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1872

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by16 opinions

  1. Stephenson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1932
  2. Bohan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1923
  3. Department of Financial Institutions v. NeumannIndiana Supreme Court · 1940
  4. Gilkison v. DarlingtonIndiana Court of Appeals · 1949
  5. State v. FurryIndiana Supreme Court · 1969

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API