Legal Opinion

Murphy v. State

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1904PublishedCited by 11 opinions

FROM ROBERTSON. Appeal in error from tbe Circuit Court of Robertson County. — B. D. Bell, Judge.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Shields

The'plaintiff in error, Murphy, was-indicted and convicted in the circuit court of Robertson county for permitting his hogs to run at large in that county, and adjudged to pay a fine of $25, from which judgment he has brought the case to this court by appeal in the nature of a writ of error.

The indictment is preferred under chapter 499, p. 1342, of the Acts of the general assembly of 1903, entitled “An act to prohibit the running at large of hogs, sheep and goats in counties having a population of not less than 25,000, and not more than 25,100, according to the federal census of 1900, or any…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Condon v. MaloneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Turner v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
  3. Cook v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
  4. Peterson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
  5. Archibald v. ClarkTennessee Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Buford v. DanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  2. Darnell v. ShapardTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
  3. Hall v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  4. Thomas v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  5. Williams v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1927

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API