Legal Opinion

Archibald v. Clark

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided December 15, 1901PublishedCited by 15 opinions

FROM DAVIDSON. Appeal from the Chancery Court of Davidson County. — H. H. Cook,- Chancellor.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Wilkes

This cause involves the constitutionality of the act of April 20, 1901 (Acts 1901, p. 80, c. 55), known as “House Bill No. 1089,” and being the new road law applicable to Davidson county. Complainant at the January term, 1901, of the county court of Davidson county, was elected road commissioner of his district, and qualified and was duly inducted into office. The defendants are justices of the peace of that district, upon whom the act in question devolves the duties of road commissioner, and the bill seeks to enjoin them. The chancellor held the act constitutional, and the court of chancery…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Condon v. MaloneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1901

3Cited by15 opinions

  1. State ex rel. Buford v. DanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
  2. State Ex Rel. v. CollierTennessee Supreme Court · 1930
  3. State v. Cumberland ClubTennessee Supreme Court · 1916
  4. Hall v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1910
  5. Heiskell v. Knox CountyTennessee Supreme Court · 1915

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API