Hall v. State
Tennessee Supreme Court
PROM MONTGOMERY. Appeal in error from tbe Criminal Court of Montgomery County. — C. W. Tyler, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Shields
The facts in this case are not disputed. The defendant was indicted under chapter 263 of the Acts of 1903. The act is a stock law, and is applicable to those counties having a population, by the census of 1900, of not less than 35,000, nor moré than 36,250, or having a like population by any subsequent census. Montgomery county, by reason of its population under the census of 1900, fell within the act, and it applied to that county. It was, in fact, the only county to which the act applied according to the census of 1900.
This case was tried in the criminal court of Montgomery county on an…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Condon v. MaloneyTennessee Supreme Court · 1901
- Sutton v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1896
- Turner v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1902
- Cook v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1891
- Peterson v. StateTennessee Supreme Court · 1900
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- State ex rel. Buford v. DanielSupreme Court of Florida · 1924
- Darnell v. ShapardTennessee Supreme Court · 1928
- James Cable Partners, L.P. v. City of JamestownCourt of Appeals of Tennessee · 1991
- Hamilton Nat. Bank v. McCanlessTennessee Supreme Court · 1940
- State Ex Rel. Bastnagel v. City of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1970
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.