Legal Opinion

Haugen v. Raupach

Washington Supreme Court

Decided August 31, 1953No. 32387PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtGrady, C. J.

— This action was brought by respondents to recover a judgment against appellants for a balance claimed to be owing on a building construction contract and to foreclose a contractor’s lien. A subcontractor intervened in the action, seeking judgment against respondents and appellants and the foreclosure of a lien filed by him. Appellants answered the amended complaint by denials and a cross-complaint alleging noncompliance with the contract in seventy-three different particulars, for which they claimed damages. The answer to the complaint in intervention denied many of its allegations, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Standard Lumber Co. v. FieldsWashington Supreme Court · 1947
  2. Flint v. BronsonWashington Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Halsey v. Waukesha Springs Sanitarium Co.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1905
  4. Lindblom v. MayarWashington Supreme Court · 1914

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brandt v. ImperoCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1969
  2. Blecick v. School District No. 18 of Cochise CountyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1965
  3. Schumacher Painting Co. v. First Union Management, Inc.Court of Appeals of Washington · 1993
  4. Hartford Electric Applicators of Thermalux, Inc. v. AldenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1975
  5. Hopkins v. UlvestadWashington Supreme Court · 1955

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API