Legal Opinion
Ramsey v. Kantor
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided September 19, 1996No. 95-35471PublishedCited by 39 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
REINHARDT, Circuit Judge:
This ease raises several questions of statutory interpretation involving the Endangered Species Act (ESA) and the National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA), and the way in which the two statutory schemes interact.
First, we must decide whether the issuance of an incidental take statement under § 7 of the ESA may in appropriate circumstances permit parties that are neither federal agencies nor applicants to engage in incidental takes consistent with the statement without applying for section 10 permits. We answer this question in the affirmative and conclude that Oregon…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Chevron U. S. A. Inc. v. Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Conner v. BurfordCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Greenpeace Action v. FranklinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Save the Yaak Committee, Donn Vance v. J.R. Block, Secretary of Agriculture R. Max Peterson, Chief, Forest Service Thomas Costin, Region I ForesterCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- United States v. OregonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by39 opinions
- Rio Grande Silvery Minnow v. Bureau of ReclamationCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2010
- Sierra Club v. United States Army Corps of EngineersCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2015
- Loggerhead Turtle v. County Council of Volusia County, FloridaCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1998
- Ramsey v. KantorCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1996
- Arizona Cattle Growers' Association v. United States Fish And WildlifeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2001
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.