Legal Opinion

Brosnahan v. Eu

California Supreme Court

Decided March 11, 1982No. S.F. 24393PublishedCited by 52 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion

THE COURT.

In this proceeding petitioners seek to prevent respondent Secretary of ¡State from instituting measures preparatory to placing on the ballot at the June 1982 Primary Election an initiative measure relating to “Criminal Justice” and entitled (in § 1 thereof) “The Victims’ Bill of Rights.” Petitioners assert that respondent has failed to comply with certain statutory provisions regarding the number of valid signatures required to qualify the measure for the ballot, and that the proposed measure is unconstitutional because it contains more than one subject (Cal. Const., art. II,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Clean Air Constituency v. California State Air Resources BoardCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
  2. Mulkey v. ReitmanCalifornia Supreme Court · 1966
  3. Gayle v. HammCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
  4. Wind v. HiteCalifornia Supreme Court · 1962

3Cited by52 opinions

  1. Raven v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
  2. Brosnahan v. BrownCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
  3. Legislature v. DeukmejianCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Finnie v. Town of TiburonCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
  5. American Federation of Labor-Congress of Industrial Organizations v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1984

47 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API