Wind v. Hite
California Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
THE COURT.
Plaintiffs sought and obtained a preliminary injunction, restraining defendant, the Registrar of Voters of Los Angeles County, from submitting to the voters a proposition which, if adopted, would prohibit the playing of draw poker in that county. Defendant and the intervener, the People of the State of California, have noticed an appeal to this court and have filed an application for a writ of supersedeas. The injunction is clearly prohibitory in character, and supersedeas is the proper remedy. (Food & Grocery Bureau, Inc. v. Garfield, 18 Cal.2d 174, 177 [114 P.2d 579]; see 3…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Food & Grocery Bureau v. GarfieldCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
3Cited by7 opinions
- Brosnahan v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- California Trial Lawyers Assn. v. EuCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988
- Martinez v. Board of SupervisorsCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1972
- Brosnahan v. EuCalifornia Supreme Court · 1982
- Schmitz v. YoungerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1978
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.