Legal Opinion

Pleasant Grove City v. Holman

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 20, 1921No. 3653PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Fourth District, Utah County; A. B. Morga/n, Judge. Action by Pleasant Grove City against Artemus Holman and another. From' a judgment for defendants, plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtWeber, J.

In its complaint, the appellant, a municipal corporation, alleges that it is charged with the duty of regulating the system of water courses leading to and within the plaintiff city; that for many years prior to the commencement of this action it has regulated and controlled the same and distributed the water to users for culinary, domestic, and irrigation purposes, both within and without the territorial limits of the city; that said water courses are.supplied from three natural streams which are interlocking and communicating, and that the high and low water periods of each of said natural…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rio Grande Lumber Co. v. DarkeUtah Supreme Court · 1917
  2. State ex rel. Lundberg v. Green River Irrigation DistrictUtah Supreme Court · 1911
  3. Pleasant Grove City v. LindsayUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  4. Campbell v. Zion's Co-op. Home Building & Real Estate Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1914
  5. Blackrock Copper Min. & Mill. Co. v. TingeyUtah Supreme Court · 1908

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Thurnwald v. A.E.Utah Supreme Court · 2007
  2. The Best Foods, Inc. v. Christensen, State Treas.Utah Supreme Court · 1930
  3. City of Grass Valley v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  4. City of Grass Valley v. WalkinshawCalifornia Supreme Court · 1949
  5. North Tintic Mining Co. v. Crockett, Secy. of StateUtah Supreme Court · 1929

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API