Legal Opinion

Campbell v. Zion's Co-op. Home Building & Real Estate Co.

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 12, 1914No. 2626-2634PublishedCited by 14 opinions

Appeal from District Court; Second District; Hon. J. A. Howell, Judge. Separate actions by A. M. Campbell, by Fred King, by P. B. Haslet, by George King, by Fred W. Voll, by Fred Brein-ing, by B. F. Estes, by W. B. Haymond, and by B. F. Rugg against the Zion’s Co-operative Home Building & Real Estate Company. Judgment for plaintiff in each case. Defendant appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtStraup, J.

These are actions to recover moneys from the defendant paid by the plaintiffs in the purchase of its capital stock. They are based on a rescission of contract for alleged deceit, misrepresentations, and fraud. There are nine cases — different plaintiffs, same defendant. The transactions and controversies arising out of them are similar. The eases were tried separately to the court. In each the plaintiff had judgment for the full demand of the complaint. The defendant appeals in each with separate transcripts and abstracts of the records. The cases were here argued and submitted together on…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Southern Development Co. v. SilvaSupreme Court of the United States · 1888
  2. Phelps v. GradyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
  3. Warner v. BenjaminWisconsin Supreme Court · 1895
  4. Mumford v. TolmanIllinois Supreme Court · 1895
  5. Kimber v. YoungCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. Pace v. ParrishUtah Supreme Court · 1952
  2. Stuck v. Delta Land & Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Justheim Petroleum Co. v. HammondCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1955
  4. Cobb v. HartensteinUtah Supreme Court · 1915
  5. Nielson v. Leamington Mines & Exploration Corp.Utah Supreme Court · 1935

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API