Legal Opinion

Faben v. Muir

Washington Supreme Court

Decided July 1, 1910No. 8626PublishedCited by 10 opinions

Appeal from an order of the. superior court for King county, Gay, J., entered December 11, 1909, granting a new trial, after the verdict of a jury rendered in favor of the plaintiff, in an action on contract.

1Per curiam

The appellant sued the respondent, claiming a balance due upon an account for services as an attorney. Issue was taken upon the allegations of the complaint and the cause tried before a jury, who returned a verdict in the appellant’s favor. The respondent thereupon moved for a new trial, setting up the various statutory grounds therefor, which motion the court granted on the specific ground that the evidence was insufficient to support the verdict. From the order granting a new trial, this appeal is taken.

In the early case of Rotting v. Cleman, 12 Wash. 615, 41 Pac. 907, this court announced…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Rotting v. ClemanWashington Supreme Court · 1895
  2. Welever v. Advance Shingle Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1904
  3. Hughes v. Dexter Horton & Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1901
  4. Angus v. WambaWashington Supreme Court · 1908
  5. Latimer v. BlackWashington Supreme Court · 1901

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Brown v. City of Walla WallaWashington Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Snider v. Washington Water Power Co.Washington Supreme Court · 1912
  3. State v. BrentWashington Supreme Court · 1948
  4. Stickney v. CongdonWashington Supreme Court · 1926
  5. Alberts v. Rasher, Kingman, HerrinWashington Supreme Court · 1924

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API