Legal Opinion
Simon v. Royal Business Funds Corp.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided May 12, 1970PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order entered September 10, 1969, dismissing complaint herein affirmed, without costs and without disbursements. The order appealed from found that the amended complaint suffered from the same malady affecting the original complaint: “ that it failed to set forth the material allegations of the complaint, using eonelusory allegations without any facts to support them.” We affirm on somewhat different grounds. The fact that plaintiff has a cause of action against the Electrospace Corporation for breach of contract does not foreclose an action against the defendants for the damage he suffered…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Hornstein v. PodwitzNew York Court of Appeals · 1930
- Simon v. Noma Electric Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
- Shapiro v. Greenwich Savings BankAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1943
3Cited by8 opinions
- Eugene B. Kassman v. The American University. Appeal of Lloyd UltanCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1976
- Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1980
- Zarcone v. PerryAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Irene R. Lacks v. Youssef Fahmi and Janet F. CottonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1980
- American Home Assurance Company v. VaughnCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1974
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.