Legal Opinion

Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation Enterprises

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided October 21, 1980No. 80 Civ. 856PublishedCited by 36 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER

OWEN, District Judge.

In this action under the Copyright Act of 1976,17 U.S.C. § 101 et seq. (the “Copyright Act”), the defendants Nation Enterprises and The Nation Associates, Inc. (hereinafter collectively referred to as “The Nation”) have moved to dismiss plaintiffs’ pendant state law claims of conversion (Second Count) and tortious interference with contract (Third Count). 1

The central allegations of the amended complaint may be summarized as follows. In February 1977, plaintiffs Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. (“Harper & Row”) and The Reader’s Digest Association, Inc.…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. International News Service v. Associated PressSupreme Court of the United States · 1919
  2. Wainwright Securities Inc. v. Wall Street Transcript Corporation and Richard A. HolmanCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1977
  3. Drew Pearson and Jack Anderson v. Thomas J. DoddCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1969
  4. Campbell v. . GatesNew York Court of Appeals · 1923
  5. Time Incorporated v. Bernard Geis AssociatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1968

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by36 opinions

  1. Baltimore Orioles, Inc. v. Major League Baseball Players Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
  2. Mayer v. Josiah Wedgwood & Sons, Ltd.District Court, S.D. New York · 1985
  3. Debra Laws v. Sony Music Entertainment, Inc., D/B/A Epic Records, a Delaware CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
  4. Harper & Row, Publishers, Inc. v. Nation EnterprisesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1983
  5. Smith v. WeinsteinDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1984

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API