Legal Opinion
McGraw Company, a Corporation v. Preformed Line Products Company, a Corporation
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided May 26, 1966No. 20023_1PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
JAMESON, District Judge:
This is an appeal from an order dismissing, without prejudice, a complaint for patent infringement and a counterclaim for declaratory judgment.
The appellee, Preformed Line Products Company, filed a complaint on May 1, 1958, against the City of Los Angeles and appellant, McGraw-Edison Company, charging infringement of United States Letters Patent No. 2,761,273, granted September 4, 1956, for “Dead-End For Cables”. 1 Both defendants filed answers and counterclaims.
A stipulation was filed June 15, 1964, dismissing without prejudice the complaint as to the City of Los…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Aetna Life Insurance v. HaworthSupreme Court of the United States · 1937
- Kerotest Manufacturing Co. v. C-O-Two Fire Equipment Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- In Re LennonSupreme Court of the United States · 1897
- Delno v. Market St. Ry. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1942
- Maryland Casualty Co. v. Boyle Const. Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1941
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- United States v. WashingtonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Broadview Chemical Corporation v. Loctite CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
- Waffenschmidt v. MackayCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1985
- Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc. v. United States Environmental Protection Agency, Battery Council International, Respondents-IntervenorsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992
- Biotics Research Corporation v. Margaret Heckler, Sec'y Etc., Seroyal Brands, Inc. v. Margaret Heckler, Sec'y Etc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.