Hall v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
Murphy, Justice.
TMs is an action for damages alleged to have been sustained by the plaintiff as a result of a nuisance created by the defendant in the operation of its canning plant in Winnebago, Minnesota. The plaintiff had a verdict for $1,350. The defendant appeals from the order of the district court denying its motion for a new trial, contending that the verdict is excessive and is not sustained by the evidence and that plaintiffs counsel in his closing argument to the jury was guilty of misconduct.
From the record it appears that the plaintiff is the owner of a 140-acre farm located…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Wilson v. SorgeSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1959
- Millett v. Minnesota Crushed Stone Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1920
- Krueger v. City of FaribaultSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
3Cited by4 opinions
- Kramer v. KramerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1968
- Hill v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1961
- Poston v. ColestockCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1995
- Ellingson v. Burlington Northern RailroadCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987