Legal Opinion

Krueger v. City of Faribault

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided May 18, 1945No. 33,935PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Peterson, Justice.

Plaintiff, a farmer living on his farm on the banks of the Cannon River about three to three and one-half miles below the city of Faribault, sues the city to recover damages for inconvenience and discomfort caused by its having deposited raw and untreated sewage into the Straight River, which empties into the Cannon at a point just north of the city. The complaint is that sewage containing .waste matter and human excrement so polluted the water that in the spring during high water the sewage was deposited upon plaintiff’s-land and that during the summer the stream gave off…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Moeller v. St. Paul City Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1944
  2. Pierce v. WagnerSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1882
  3. Thoirs v. PounsfordSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
  4. Greene v. MathiowetzSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1942
  5. Town of Wells v. SullivanSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1914

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Donea v. Massachusetts Mutual Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1945
  2. Hall v. Stokely-Van Camp, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1960

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API