Legal Opinion

People v. Adams

New York Court of Appeals

Decided April 3, 1979PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Memorandum.

The order of the Appellate Division should be affirmed. Despite the defendant’s manifested awareness of the Trial Judge’s involvement in the plea negotiations and of the statutorily prescribed term for a class A-III felony, neither at the time he decided to plead guilty, nor at his sentencing four *1048months later, did the defendant take any exception. Nor did he subsequently move to vacate the plea and the sentence imposed thereon. Consequently, any errors in connection therewith, if errors they were, not having been preserved, are now beyond our power of review…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. People v. McgowenNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
  2. People v. AdamsNew York Court of Appeals · 1976

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. The People v. Christian WilliamsNew York Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. People v. PascaleNew York Court of Appeals · 1980
  3. People v. WarrenNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  4. People v. BellNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  5. People v. PrimmerNew York Court of Appeals · 1979

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API