Legal Opinion
Nash v. Jeffes
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
Decided July 10, 1984No. 83-5261PublishedCited by 30 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
BECKER, Circuit Judge.
This appeal presents two questions concerning the application of the Interstate Agreement on Detainers (the “IAD”).1 The first question is whether the IAD applies to a detainer based on a charge that a prisoner violated his probation. The second question is whether New Jersey, the state that filed the detainer, forfeited its right to insist on compliance with the standard procedures for requesting disposition of the charge underlying a detainer because its probation department advised the prisoner, who had informally requested that the charge be…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Cuyler v. AdamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Pittman v. StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1973
- Cooper v. LockhartCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1973
- Frederick E. Hopper v. United States Parole CommissionCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- Blackwell v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1976
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by30 opinions
- Carchman v. NashSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
- United States v. Michael DentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1998
- United States v. David Henson, A/K/A Paul v. AndrewsCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1991
- Richard W. Norton v. Al C. ParkeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
- Steven J. Casper, M-8294 v. Joseph Ryan, and the Attorney General of the State of Pennsylvania, and the District Attorney for Philadelphia CountyCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
25 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.