Legal Opinion
Reed's Jewelers, Inc. v. Adt Co.
Court of Appeals of North Carolina
Decided November 20, 1979No. 795SC170PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ERWIN, Judge.
Plaintiff presents one question for review: “Was it proper for the court to grant the defendant appellee’s motion for summary judgment?” We answer, “Yes,” for the reasons that follow.
G.S. 1A-1, Rule 56(c), of the Rules of Civil Procedure provides that summary judgment shall be entered “if the pleadings, depositions, answers to interrogatories, and admissions on file, together with the affidavits, if any, show that there is no genuine issue as to any material fact and that any party is entitled to a judgment as a matter of law.” See also Kidd v. Early, 289 N.C. 343, 222 S.E. 2d…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Kessing v. National Mortgage CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
- Kidd v. EarlySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Page v. SloanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
- Gas House, Inc. v. Southern Bell Telephone & Telegraph Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1976
- Foont-Freedenfeld Corp. v. Electro-Protective Corp.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- General Bargain Center v. American Alarm Co.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1982
- Schrier v. Beltway Alarm Co.Court of Special Appeals of Maryland · 1987
- Blaylock Grading Co., LLP v. SmithCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2008
- Donegal Mutual Insurance v. Tri-Plex Security Alarm SystemsSuperior Court of Delaware · 1992
- Bouvier Bros. v. Baker Protective ServicesMassachusetts Superior Court · 1994
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.