Legal Opinion

Bouvier Bros. v. Baker Protective Services

Massachusetts Superior Court

Decided April 15, 1994No. 93-421Published

1Opinion of the CourtBrady, J.

This case arises out of an alarm service agreement entered into by the parties. Plaintiff, Bouvier Brothers, Inc. (“Bouvier Brothers”), has initiated suit against defendant, Baker Protective Services d/b/a Wells Fargo Alarm Services (‘Wells Fargo”), seeking to recover for properly damage it suffered when thieves disabled the alarm system serviced by defendant and burglarized plaintiffs jewelry store. Plaintiff asserts that defendant’s conduct — namely, failing to properly monitor the alarm system — caused it to incur damages. Plaintiffs complaint seeks recovery based on the following…

2Cases cited28 opinions

  1. McEvoy Travel Bureau, Inc. v. Norton Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  2. Danca v. Taunton Savings BankMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1982
  3. Zimmerman v. KentMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1991
  4. Barrett Associates, Inc. v. AronsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1963
  5. USM Corp. v. Arthur D. Little Systems, Inc.Massachusetts Appeals Court · 1989

23 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API