Commonwealth v. Maris
Superior Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the Court
OLSZEWSKI, Judge.
William Maris appeals from a judgment of sentence entered March 31,1992. The trial court denied Maris’ motion for post-conviction relief holding that there were no issues concerning any material fact, Maris was not entitled to post-conviction relief, and no purpose would be served by any further proceedings. We quash Maris’ appeal because his brief violates the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure to a degree that precludes us from conducting meaningful review of his claims. Commonwealth v. Sanford, 299 Pa.Super. 64, 445 A.2d 149 (1982).
On January 30, 1992, Maris pled…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Commonwealth v. SanfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
- Commonwealth v. WhitemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
- O'NEILL v. Checker Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
- Commonwealth v. RodgersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
- Commonwealth v. LeibSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by96 opinions
- Commonwealth v. FreelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. RiveraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
- Wilkins v. MarsicoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
- PHH Mortgage Corp. v. Powell, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth v. GenoveseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.