Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Maris

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 13, 1993No. 617PublishedCited by 96 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OLSZEWSKI, Judge.

William Maris appeals from a judgment of sentence entered March 31,1992. The trial court denied Maris’ motion for post-conviction relief holding that there were no issues concerning any material fact, Maris was not entitled to post-conviction relief, and no purpose would be served by any further proceedings. We quash Maris’ appeal because his brief violates the Pennsylvania Rules of Appellate Procedure to a degree that precludes us from conducting meaningful review of his claims. Commonwealth v. Sanford, 299 Pa.Super. 64, 445 A.2d 149 (1982).

On January 30, 1992, Maris pled…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. SanfordSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982
  2. Commonwealth v. WhitemanSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  3. O'NEILL v. Checker Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  4. Commonwealth v. RodgersSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. Commonwealth v. LeibSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1991

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by96 opinions

  1. Commonwealth v. FreelandSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  2. Commonwealth v. RiveraSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996
  3. Wilkins v. MarsicoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2006
  4. PHH Mortgage Corp. v. Powell, R.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
  5. Commonwealth v. GenoveseSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1996

91 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API