Legal Opinion

Covell v. Bailey

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided October 3, 1988No. 88-86PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

David Newbern, Justice.

The appellants, Weldon Coveil and Martin V. Carmical, challenged an ordinance of the City of Beebe which rezoned property adjacent to theirs. They sought injunction, mandamus, and declaratory judgment against the appellees, who are the members of the Beebe City Council, and David McAfee, who is the owner of the land. Mr. McAfee is also a member of the city council but did not vote on the ordinance which proposed to change the zoning from R-l, single family residential, to R-3, multifamily dwellings. Before the merits of the case were to be heard, the city council…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. W. T. Grant Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1953
  2. Nethercutt v. Pulaski County Special School DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1970
  3. Carroll v. SchneiderSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1947
  4. Stover v. StoverSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1985
  5. Hyde v. CM Vending Co., Inc.Supreme Court of Arkansas · 1986

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. George v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1991
  2. Matter of Adoption of Perkins/PollnowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  3. Martin Farm Enterprises, Inc. v. HayesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995
  4. Matter of Adoption of Perkins/PollnowSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1989
  5. McCuen v. HarrisSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1995

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API