Moen v. Lillestal
North Dakota Supreme Court
Appeal from District Court, Richland County; Lauder, J. Action by John L. Moen against Ole P. Lillestal and others. From the judgment, plaintiff and D. E. Rice, one of the defendants, appeal.
1Opinion of the CourtBartholomew, J.
This is a contest for priority of right to the proceeds of a crop raised by the defendant Lillestal in the year 1894 on the S. W. % and the W. of the S. E. % of section 15, township 133, range 49, in Richland County, N. D. Plaintiff claims priority as to one-half of said crop as tenant in common of the crop with said Lillestal, and as to the other half he claims priority by reason of Lillestal’s abandonment of the land. Both claims are based upon the contract hereafter mentioned. The defendant Lillestal makes no claim whatever to the crop. The defendant Rice claims a portion of the crop under…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fall v. HazelriggIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
- Willis v. WozencraftCalifornia Supreme Court · 1863
- Stone v. SpragueNew York Supreme Court · 1855
- Newby v. VestalIndiana Supreme Court · 1855
- Thompson v. BowerNew York Supreme Court · 1871
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- Woodward v. McCollumNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1907
- Fargusson v. TalcottNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1897
- Lynch v. MillsWashington Supreme Court · 1909
- Federal Land Bank v. McCloudIdaho Supreme Court · 1933
- Schauble v. SchulzCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1905
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.