Legal Opinion
Zora v. State Ethics Commission
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court
Decided June 24, 1993PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtGreaney, J.
After an adjudicatory hearing, the State Ethics Commission (commission) determined that the plaintiffs, Joseph P. Zora, Sr. (Zora Sr.), and Joseph P. Zora, Jr. (Zora Jr.), had violated the State conflict of interest law covering public officials and employees. See G. L. c. 268A, § 17 (c) (1990 ed.). 2 Due to certain mitigating circum stances, the commission did not impose fines or other civil sanctions on either plaintiff. See G. L. c. 268B, § 4 (1990 ed.). The plaintiffs filed a complaint for judicial review in the Superior Court and the commission counterclaimed for affirmation of its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- United States v. O'BrienSupreme Court of the United States · 1968
- Seagram Distillers Co. v. Alcoholic Beverages Control CommissionMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1988
- Levy v. Board of Registration & Discipline in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
- Parker v. SimpsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902
- Town of Nantucket v. BeineckeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1979
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- Stonehill College v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2004
- G.E.B. v. S.R.W.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1996
- State Board of Retirement v. WoodwardMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2006
- Kellogg v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2011
- Herridge v. Board of Registration in MedicineMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1995
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.