Legal Opinion
Hardie v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided October 1, 2001No. 01-5005PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CLEVENGER, Circuit Judge.
Plaintiffs-Appellants George G. Hardie, Kard King, Inc., and Park Place Associates, Ltd. (collectively, “PPA”), appeal from the decision of the United States Court of Federal Claims, which dismissed on the pleadings PPA’s contract claim against the United States for lack of subject matter jurisdiction and PPA’s Fifth Amendment takings claim for failure to state a claim upon which relief can be granted. Hardie v. United States, No. 99-890C (Fed.Cl. Aug. 31, 2000). We vacate the judgment of the Court of Federal Claims in favor of the United States, and remand for…
2Cases cited25 opinions
- United States v. TestanSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- United States v. MitchellSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Lynch v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- United States v. Winstar Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- The United States v. Johnson Controls, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1983
20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Park Place Associates, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2009
- George G. Hardie, Kard King, Inc., and Park Place Associates, Ltd. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2004
- Fischer v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2011
- Guarantee Company of North v. Ikhana, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2020
- Guarantee Company of North v. Ikhana, LLCCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2019
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.