Legal Opinion

State v. PONSART

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided June 11, 2010No. 2 CA-CR 2009-0205PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

ECKERSTROM, Presiding Judge.

¶ 1 In 2004, appellant John Ponsart, Jr., was convicted after pleading no contest to attempted molestation of a child. Pursuant to a stipulation in his plea agreement, the trial court suspended the imposition of sentence and placed him on lifetime probation. In 2008, after a contested probation violation hearing, the court found Ponsart had violated the terms of his probation, revoked it, and sentenced him to an aggravated prison term of fifteen years. On appeal, Ponsart relies on State v. Schmidt, 220 Ariz. 563, 208 P.3d 214 (2009), to argue the court…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Apprendi v. New JerseySupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Janson v. ChristensenArizona Supreme Court · 1991
  3. Zamora v. ReinsteinArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  4. State v. FellCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2002
  5. State v. RosengrenCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2000

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Frank Hoffman v. Hon. chandler/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State v. RegenoldArizona Supreme Court · 2011
  3. State v. De GrooteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. State v. RegenoldArizona Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API