State v. Regenold
Arizona Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
BERCH, Chief Justice.
¶ 1 A defendant in a noncapital ease “may not appeal from a judgment or sentence that is entered pursuant to a plea agreement or an admission to a probation violation.” Ariz. Rev.Stat. (“A.R.S.”) § 13-4033(B) (2010). We have been asked to decide whether a defendant who pleads guilty but later contests an alleged probation violation may appeal the resulting sentence. We hold that A.R.S § 13-4033(B) does not limit the right of appeal in such circumstances.
I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
¶ 2 Christopher Michael Regenold was indicted for one count of luring a minor for *379s…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1996
- State v. PONSARTCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010
3Cited by9 opinions
- Frank Hoffman v. Hon. chandler/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2013
- State of Arizona v. Demitres RobertsonArizona Supreme Court · 2020
- State v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- State v. BurneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
- State v. De GrooteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.