Legal Opinion

State v. Regenold

Arizona Supreme Court

Decided March 1, 2011No. CR-10-0154-PRPublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

BERCH, Chief Justice.

¶ 1 A defendant in a noncapital ease “may not appeal from a judgment or sentence that is entered pursuant to a plea agreement or an admission to a probation violation.” Ariz. Rev.Stat. (“A.R.S.”) § 13-4033(B) (2010). We have been asked to decide whether a defendant who pleads guilty but later contests an alleged probation violation may appeal the resulting sentence. We hold that A.R.S § 13-4033(B) does not limit the right of appeal in such circumstances.

I. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY

¶ 2 Christopher Michael Regenold was indicted for one count of luring a minor for *379s…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. SmithArizona Supreme Court · 1996
  2. State v. PONSARTCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2010

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Frank Hoffman v. Hon. chandler/stateArizona Supreme Court · 2013
  2. State of Arizona v. Demitres RobertsonArizona Supreme Court · 2020
  3. State v. RobertsonCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  4. State v. BurneyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019
  5. State v. De GrooteCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 2019

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API