In re Restorff
Supreme Court of Minnesota
1Opinion of the Court
GILDEA, Chief Justice.
*15In this case we are asked to decide whether appellant Amanda Restorff committed maltreatment by neglect under the Maltreatment of Minors Act ("the Act"). Minn. Stat. § 626.556, subd. 2(g) (2018). The Commissioner of Human Services ("Commissioner") determined that Restorff committed maltreatment under the Act when a 3-year-old child wandered away from her daycare. On appeal, Restorff argues that the supervision she provided was appropriate and that the Commissioner misinterpreted the Act in finding her responsible for maltreatment. Because we conclude that the…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- State v. ThonesavanhSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2017
- Dokmo v. Independent School District No. 11Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
- Van Asperen v. Darling Olds, Inc.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1958
- Gibson v. Civil Service BoardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1969
- Morey v. School Board of Independent School District No. 492Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1965
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Hubbard County, Relator v. James Card, Public Employees Retirement Association of Minnesota, ...Court of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026
- In the Matter of the Complaint of Troy Scheffler Regarding the Committee to Elect Josh HeintzemanCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2026
- In the Matter of the Surveillance and Integrity Review (SIRS) Appeal by Nobility Home Health Care, Inc. A21-1477, ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- In the Matter of the Surveillance and Integrity Review (SIRS) Appeal by Nobility Home Health Care, Inc. A21-1477, ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
- In the Matter of the Surveillance and Integrity Review (SIRS) Appeal by Nobility Home Health Care, Inc. A21-1477, ...Supreme Court of Minnesota · 2024
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.