Legal Opinion

Territory v. Dondero

Hawaii Supreme Court

Decided February 13, 1912PublishedCited by 7 opinions

Appeal prom District Magistrate op Honolulu.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT BY

DE BOLT, J.

" The defendant was convicted and adjudged to pay a fine of fifteen dollars and costs by the district magistrate of Honolulu for the violation of section 29 of ordinance No. 11 of the City and County of Honolulu, the specific act of the defendant upon which the conviction was based being the.operating of a motor car at a greater rate of speed than fifteen miles an hour within a restricted area in the City and County of Honolulu.

Upon conviction, the defendant appealed on points of law from the judgment of the district magistrate to this court. Three questions…

2Cases cited42 opinions

  1. In Re PfahlerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1906
  2. Rogers v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1828
  3. City of St. Louis v. WeitzelSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
  4. State ex rel. Moore v. ArchibaldNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1896
  5. In re SicCalifornia Supreme Court · 1887

37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Schwab v. AriyoshiHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Bremner v. City & County of HonoluluHawaii Intermediate Court of Appeals · 2001
  3. Villon v. Marriott Hotel Services, Inc.Hawaii Supreme Court · 2013
  4. Territory v. Hop KeeHawaii Supreme Court · 1912
  5. Schnack v. City of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1955

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API