Legal Opinion
Schnack v. City of Honolulu
Hawaii Supreme Court
Decided October 20, 1955No. 3018PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT BY
STAINBACK, J.
Plaintiffs, who are the owners of certain lands on Maunakea street, Honolulu, City and County of Honolulu, Territory of Hawaii, brought an action to quiet their title to such lands against an assessment and lien sought to be placed thereon by defendant under ordinance number 1301 of the City and County of Honolulu establishing public parking in the congested downtown district of Honolulu and providing for assessments upon the lands benefited.
Pursuant to a plan of the City and County for condemning certain lands and buildings thereon in .various sections of…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Louisville & Nashville Railroad v. Barber Asphalt Paving Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1905
- Illinois Central Railroad v. DecaturSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
- Valley Farms Co. of Yonkers v. County of WestchesterSupreme Court of the United States · 1923
- Posados v. Warner, Barnes & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1929
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Schwab v. AriyoshiHawaii Supreme Court · 1977
- Territory of Hawaii v. MendoncaHawaii Supreme Court · 1962
- Brock v. LemkeHawaii Supreme Court · 1969
- Schnack v. City of HonoluluHawaii Supreme Court · 1957