Legal Opinion

Birkholz v. Cheese Makers Mutual Casualty Co.

Wisconsin Supreme Court

Decided December 4, 1956PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBrown, J.

Appellants submit that the policy insuring Birkholz Brothers against liability constitutes Birkholzes’ insurance company their agent to effect settlements, and participation in settlement by the agent is participation by the principal. From there they advance to the proposition stated in Wm. H. Heinemann Creameries v. Milwaukee Automobile Ins. Co. (1955), 270 Wis. 443, 452b, 71 N. W. (2d) 395, that “the making of the original settlement without any express reservation of rights by the settlor constitutes a com-*192píete accord and satisfaction of all claims of the immediate parties to the…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Wm. H. Heinemann Creameries, Inc. v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Faught Ex Rel. Faught v. WashamSupreme Court of Missouri · 1959
  2. Austin v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1986
  3. Lampley v. BellSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1959
  4. Jefferson Mills, Inc. v. GregsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1971
  5. Hull v. GlewweCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2019

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API