Legal Opinion

Lampley v. Bell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided September 23, 1959No. 28PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNY, J.

As we interpret the record on this -appeal, the only question to be determined is whether or not the provision in the plaintiff’s policy of insurance, which provides that the insurance carrier shall have the power to “make such investigation and settlement of any claim or suit as it deems expedient,” is binding on the insured where the insurer makes'the settlement and procures releases either without the knowledge or consent of the insured or over the protest of .the insured.

It seems to be well-nigh the universal holding in this country that where an insurance carrier makes a settlement in…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Hurley v. McMillanCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1954
  2. Foremost Dairies Inc. v. Campbell Coal Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1938
  3. Snyder v. Kenan Oil Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  4. Wm. H. Heinemann Creameries, Inc. v. Milwaukee Automobile InsuranceWisconsin Supreme Court · 1955
  5. Fikes v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Cash v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2000
  2. Keith v. GlennSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  3. Bradford v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Potter v. Hilemn Laboratories, Inc.Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
  5. Phillips v. AlstonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API