Legal Opinion

Austin v. Cox

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided July 3, 1986No. 85-159PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The plaintiff, Phillip Clark Austin, appeals from a summary judgment granted in favor of the defendant, Daryl Dewayne Cox. This case arises out of a two-vehicle collision in which a police car, being driven by on-duty policeman Austin, collided with a car driven by Cox. Both parties were injured, and both claimed to be free of fault.

Three separate lawsuits resulted from this occurrence, although, for the sake of discussion, only one of the lawsuits is relevant here. In that lawsuit, Austin on February 17, 1981 filed a complaint alleging negligence and wantonness against Cox and Cox's father.1…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Butler v. Michigan Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1981
  2. Craft v. Standard Acc. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1929
  3. Bradford v. KellySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  4. Fikes v. JohnsonSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1952
  5. Ray v. ALA. CENT. CREDIT UNIONSupreme Court of Alabama · 1985

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. Austin v. CoxSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  2. Bay City Const. Co., Inc. v. HayesSupreme Court of Alabama · 1993
  3. Bank Independent v. ByarsSupreme Court of Alabama · 1988
  4. Ex Parte MeztistaSupreme Court of Alabama · 2001
  5. Leisure Amer. Resorts v. Carbine Const.Supreme Court of Alabama · 1990

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API