Legal Opinion

McDonald v. Bauman

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided November 13, 1967No. 44,781PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, J.:

This is an action for damages, both actual and punitive, wherein the plaintiff seeks to recover for the defendant’s willful, wanton, malicious and cruel conduct in coming onto the plaintiff’s premises, in plaintiff’s absence, and in shooting and wounding plaintiff’s dog in the presence of plaintiff’s wife without justification or excuse and without the acquiescence or condonation of the plaintiff or his wife. The jury, after hearing the case, returned a verdict for the defendant, and the plaintiff has duly perfected an appeal.

The three…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Natanson v. KlineSupreme Court of Kansas · 1960
  2. Watkins v. LaytonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  3. Reed v. GoldneckMissouri Court of Appeals · 1905
  4. Anderson v. SmithAppellate Court of Illinois · 1880
  5. Bean v. BransonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1924

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Mayfield v. BethardsCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2016
  2. Lantz v. City of LawrenceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  3. Hollinger v. Jane C. Stormont Hospital & Training School for NursesCourt of Appeals of Kansas · 1978
  4. Dold v. SherowSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. Dicker v. SmithSupreme Court of Kansas · 1974

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API