Legal Opinion

Lantz v. City of Lawrence

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided January 14, 1983No. 54,113PublishedCited by 35 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Schroeder, C.J.;

This is an appeal by Ronald and Margaret Lantz (plaintiffs-appellants) from a summary judgment entered against them dismissing their action against the City of Lawrence and named city employees (defendants-appellees) for negligence and conversion in cutting trees and mowing vegetation on the appellants’ property. The district court found the city and named employees immune from liability under the provisions of the Kansas Tort Claims Act (KTCA). K.S.A. 1981 Supp. 75-6101 et seq.

The case arises out of the enforcement of the City of…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Dawson v. Associates Financial Services Co. of Kansas, Inc.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1974
  2. Seymour National Bank v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  3. Seymour National Bank v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Rogers v. ShanahanSupreme Court of Kansas · 1976
  5. Farmers State Bank & Trust Co. v. City of Yates CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1981

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by35 opinions

  1. Jackson v. City of Kansas CitySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  2. Bowman v. DohertySupreme Court of Kansas · 1984
  3. Hoard v. Shawnee Mission Medical CenterSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
  4. Lindenman v. UmscheidSupreme Court of Kansas · 1994
  5. Cansler v. StateSupreme Court of Kansas · 1984

30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API