Legal Opinion

Atkinson v. Adkins

California Court of Appeal

Decided June 6, 1928No. Docket No. 5194PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.

Judgment on the pleadings was rendered against the defendant. The complaint, duly verified, which was filed on the twenty-fourth day of August, 1923, declared upon a judgment rendered in favor of the plaintiff and against the defendant Adkins (and the defendant Delaney, who was not served and did not appear in this action), on the twenty-ninth day of August, 1918. In his answer appellant admitted that he has not paid the judgment, but “as to whether or not no part of said judgment has ever been paid and/or that said judgment now remains wholly or at all unpaid this defendant is not informed,…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Melone v. RuffinoCalifornia Supreme Court · 1900
  2. Janeway & Carpender v. Long Beach Paper & Paint Co.California Supreme Court · 1922
  3. Miller & Lux, Inc. v. DunlapCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1915

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Lloyd v. KleefischCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1941
  2. Thomas v. ThomasCalifornia Supreme Court · 1939
  3. Tingwall v. King Hill Irrigation DistrictIdaho Supreme Court · 1945
  4. Green v. ZissisCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
  5. Richardson v. HelisSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1939

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API