Legal Opinion
Green v. Zissis
California Court of Appeal
Decided April 27, 1992No. H008197PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
CAPACCIOLI, Acting P. J.
Plaintiff brought an independent action on a judgment after he failed to timely renew it. The trial court ruled for defendant after it found that plaintiff’s judgment had become unenforceable because he failed to timely renew it and therefore it could no longer provide the basis for an action. On appeal, plaintiff asserts that he was entitled to judgment because he was not seeking to renew or “enforce” his judgment but was instead bringing a new action which, when the tolling provisions of Code of Civil Procedure 1 section 351 were taken into account, was…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Dew v. AppleberryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
- Hoover v. GalbraithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1972
- Pratali v. GatesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1992
- Cvecich v. GiardinoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
- Turner v. DonovanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1942
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- FIDELITY CREDITOR SERVICE, INC. v. BrowneCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2001
- Barkley v. City of Blue LakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1996
- Barkley v. City of Blue LakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1993
- Heritage Marketing and Insurance Services, Inc. v. ChrustawkaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- National Union Fire Insurance Co. of Pittsburgh v. OwenbyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.