Legal Opinion
Thomas v. Thomas
California Supreme Court
Decided October 2, 1939No. L. A. 16055PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
PULLEN, J., pro tem.
By a divorce decree of the Superior Court of the County of Butte, defendant was ordered to pay to plaintiff the sum of $50 a month as alimony for her support and maintenance until she remarried. In Thomas v. Superior Court, 9 Cal. App. (2d) 383 [49 Pac. (2d) 898], and in Thomas v. Superior Court, 129 Cal. App. 282 [18 Pac. (2d) 755], other issues concerning this decree have been before the courts.
For over five years defendant defaulted in these payments, and this action was brought in the county of Los Angeles, where both plaintiff and defendant now reside, to obtain a…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Lynde v. LyndeSupreme Court of the United States · 1901
- Lynde v. Lynde; Lynde v. LyndeSupreme Court of the United States · 1900
- Miller v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1937
- German v. GermanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1936
- Sears Ettlinger v. EttlingerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1935
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Biewend v. BiewendCalifornia Supreme Court · 1941
- Defense Supplies Corp. v. Lawrence Warehouse Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1949
- Lubin v. LubinCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1956
- Zent v. ZentNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1979
- Morrow v. MorrowCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1940
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.